This week we had to cover 3 articles, plus watch a
movie. I’ll try to touch upon some important points in relation to our class.
First Ibrahim Sirkeci’s short article ‘Migration from
Turkey to Germany an Ethnic Approach’ deals with some important aspects and
first makes out some clearance on the ‘conceptual remarks’. That is both
governmental agencies and broader disciplinary specializations classifies
migration flows in terms of ‘economic (labor movements) and political (asylum
seekers, refugees) and in relation with his subject matter of the article
ethnic conflict situation Sirkeci thinks that this distinction is not really
helping. So he adopts the notion of ‘environment of insecurity’ and uses it in
a war of ‘conceptualizing the role of ethnic conflict within various national migratory
regimes. He suggests that this notion includes both material and non material
components. His argument in the article is that migration abroad is an exit
option among others and that it is a broader opportunity framework which has
shaped the international migration of Turkish Kurds.
The article in general is very interesting, especially
in the subsection of ‘migration as an alternative to conflict, conflict as an
opportunity framework for migration’. At this point he mentions about his
fieldwork in Cologne and give some examples from this work, truly interesting
migrant stories.
At this point I would like to share with you a small
real life story from a fieldwork which I’ve done as a course requirement with a
friend. It was back in Denmark when I was an exchange student and taking a Methodology
class of Anthropology we made a fieldwork which was questioning the role of
kebab shops in integration. We came up with meeting some people and there were
interesting life stories. One of the interviewers of us, whose father was a
migrant to Sweden back thirty years ago when he was in the primary school, the
father works for some time and sends money back home and also saves some and he
then returns to’ home’ and buys animals with that money. Later the son goes to Sweden as illegal
migrant and then asks for asylum in economic terms. Stays there for some time
and later he’s got rejected. Coming off from a Kurdish origin although when we
talk he doesn’t have any special concerns in terms of ethnic conflict, he
thinks that he might get the pass if he applies as a political asylum seeker
and this time he was a political asylum seeker in Denmark when we met with him.
Although this men openly has no problems in terms of ethnic conflict ‘off the
record talks’ his cousin who already got the citizenship, whom migrated there
in 80’s was very much involved with the Kurdish problem and was a truly political
migration flow. I think these are very
much in line with the Cologne interviews which show that the reasons for
migrating may not only be multiple but may also change over time.
It is also commonsense knowledge that the ethnic
conflict is an important aspect in the Kurdish international migration from
Turkey. There can be many other reasons behind and to distinguish an asylum
seeker from an economic migrant is not very easy thing to say. Again it won’t
be wrong to say that ethic conflict can be one among many explanatory aspects
of the international migrations from Turkey.
I don’t want you reader to get bored and still I want
to share you something so I’ll finalize my post after writing down a few words
about the movie of the week ‘Kebab Connection’ by Fatih Akın.
It is a family comedy
and an absurd love story. The movie is of course have stereotypical images of Turkish
fathers and about date relationships within the community and how young Ibo- a
second generation?!- deals with all these and more with his dreams of becoming the
first director of a Kung fu movie of Germany but rather makes his uncle happy
to earn his money. More you see the competition among different migrants of
origin Turkish and the Greek, Doner vs Gyros. While watching the movie satisfaction
is not guaranteed that tastes differ. But still you may capture some hints of
the migrant life in Hamburg Germany.
Ps: If you still didn’t watch the movie and in case
you do not have anything to do, plus its Sunday and there’s an early class
tomorrow… well you can reach it from here.

Reading about the person you met and the example in Sirkeci's article about people who haven't experienced ethnic conflict using it as a easier way to go I was like "WHAAAAAAAT!!!??". Can you even imagine what ridiculous things these people should've pulled in order to make the athorities believe their story.
YanıtlaSilBut then I thought, people cheat their way through life all the time and about such petty subjects, I'll just shake my head and let this one go.
you're absolutely right. but then also isn't it a survival strategy?
SilYes, definitely a survival strategy. And yes, they lie in order to create a believable story -- but Sirkeci's point is that the connections between political and economic reasons for immigrating cannot be separated. Where do you draw the line on the continuum among being tortured, having your village destroyed (while you are "peaceably" relocated) and having no way to make a living because of all the political chaos. I think asylum officers often have to draw this line (and often quite narrowly), but Sirkeci is arguing that we need to see how unclear those lines are.
SilI think it is really nice of you to share your own experience with us. As I was reading the article “Migration from Turkey to Germany: An Ethnic Approach“ I thought the same thing, that reasons why people migrate change during time.
YanıtlaSilyup. no single logic explains it all
SilThe story of the migrant using ethnic conflict as a means to be granted asylum is sad in a way, and unfair to people who actually experienced it. But it also questions the practices of asylum; why is poverty not allowed to travel across borders? (This last aspect is comes lucidly to light in Miriam Ticktin's (2006) article 'Where Ethics and Politics Meet: The violence of Humanitarianism in France', where she discusses the consequences (positive and negative) following the "illness clause". This clause grants migrants with serious health issues residence permit and can eventually lead to citizenship. She then asks 'why is it that illness is allowed to travel across borders, whereas poverty cannot?' (p. 39))
YanıtlaSil'illness clause' is definitely inetersting and I think as you directed above the process tells us also about the host countries politics and migration policy as well as international policy.
SilAs one of the only way to grnat the asylum status, the use of ethnic conflict is completely understanble. Do you think that the guy, coming from a poor conditions, without any opportunities in his home country, without money and contacts except those who live abroad, ask to himself the question if he acts legally or not ?! He wants to move abroad but this right is refused to him. Let's remind the 13article of the UDHR : Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State.
YanıtlaSilIt is not the migrant's behaviour that has to be criticed but it has to be a story that precisely highlights the shortcomings in the international policies : why he leaves his country ? Why he acts like that ? What we be the future for him ? How the both states have to do ?
etc...